Types of Research Works

Qualitative Research

(Examples of Different Types of Research Works)

2.1Grounded Theory

2.1.1.Sbaraini, A., Carter, S. M., Evans, R. W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC medical research methodology, 11(1), 1-10.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1471-2288-11-128.pdf

2.1.2.Limberg, D., Newton, T., Nelson, K., Minton, C. A. B., Super, J. T., & Ohrt, J. (2020). Research Identity Development of Counselor Education Doctoral Students: A Grounded Theory. Professional Counselor, 10(4), 488-500.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284333.pdf

2.1.3.Göçen, A. (2021). How do teachers perceive meaningful leadership? Overview of a qualitative exploration. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 31-49.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1288757.pdf

2.14.Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom interaction in teaching English as foreign language at lower secondary schools in Indonesia. Advances in language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 147-154.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164991.pdf

2.2Ethnographic

2.2.1.Ambreen, S., & Conteh, J. (2021). Children’s Interactions in Ability-Based Groups in a Primary Classroom. European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 85-107.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1287158.pdf

2.2.2.Skivington, M. (2011). Disability and Adulthood in Mexico: An Ethnographic Case Study. International Journal of special education, 26(3), 45-57.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ959000.pdf

2.2.3.Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2015). Using netnography to explore the culture of online language teaching communities. calico journal, 32(3), 426-448.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1143730.pdf

2.2.4.YalÃ, F., Su, Ä. N., & Abdullah, Ã. (2021). Reflections of bilingualism on preschool education: An ethnographic case study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17.
http://jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/viewFile/2067/692

2.3Narrative

2.3.1.Yasar, E. (2021). An International Student Learning Turkish through Cultural Interaction: A Narrative Research. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(2), 59-79.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1301498.pdf

2.3.2.Hilliard, A. T., & Foose, R. (2021). Influence of Educational Leaders on Graduate Students’ Perspectives and the Academic Advisement Process at a University. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 23-40.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1285700.pdf

2.3.3.Chen, Y. (2018). Perceptions of EFL College Students toward Collaborative Learning. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 1-4.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164588.pdf

2.3.4.Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of science Learning, 2(2), 50-57.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1226168.pdf

2.4Phenomenological

2.4.1.Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on medical education, 8(2), 90.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468135/pdf/40037_2019_Article_509.pdf

2.4.2.Dove, J., Montague, J., & Hunt, T. E. (2021). An Exploration of Primary School Teachers Maths Anxiety Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) ISSN: 1300-915X, 10(1), 32-49.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1308555.pdf

2.4.3.Ergen, Y., & Durmuş, M. E. (2021). The experiences of classroom teachers on the homework process in teaching mathematics: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 293-314.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1289017.pdf

2.5Case Study

2.5.1.Han, L. (2017). Analysis of the Problems in Language Teachers’ Action Research. International Education Studies, 10(11), 123-128.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159607.pdf

2.5.2.Camper Jr, B. M. (2019). A case study analysis among former urban gifted high school dropouts (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1231339.pdf

2.5.3.Wolfgram, M., Akram, T., & Vivona, B. (2020). On the Intersectional Amplification of Barriers to College Internships: A Comparative Case Study Analysis. WCER Working Paper No. 2020-5. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608084.pdf

2.5.4.Henry, B., Garner, C., & Guernon, A. (2018). Teaching and Learning about Interprofessional Collaboration through Student-Designed Case Study and Analysis. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 560-570.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199345.pdf

2.6Content Analysis (Qualitative)

2.6.1.Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2), 159-176.
https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1089/2386/

2.6.2.Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1070.6584&rep=rep1&type=pdf

2.6.3.Çaliskan, M., & Serçe, H. (2018). Action Research Articles on Education in Turkey: A Content Analysis. Online Submission, 19(1), 80-102.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED591437.pdf

2.6.4.Yanoff, E., LaDuke, A., & Lindner, M. (2014). Common Core Standards, Professional Texts, and Diverse Learners: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 24, 7-27.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1034904.pdf

2.7Descriptive (Qualitative)

2.7.1.Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256.
https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5805/5064

2.7.2.Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, 1(7), 147-159.
http://www.mkc.ac.in/pdf/study-material/sociology/4thSem/Methods-Tradition-2.pdf

2.7.3.Yenipinar, S. (2021). Instructional Accountability in the Turkish Context: A Qualitative Descriptive Analysis. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 91, 257-280.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284239.pdf

2.8Protocol Analysis

2.8.1.Kelley, T., & Sung, E. (2017). Examining Elementary School Students’ Transfer of Learning through Engineering Design Using Think-Aloud Protocol Analysis. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 83-108.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164698.pdf

2.8.2.Lundgrén-Laine, H., & Salanterä, S. (2010). Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research. Qualitative health research, 20(4), 565-575.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.831.5437&rep=rep1&type=pdf

2.8.3.2.8.3. Kelley, T., & Sung, E. (2017). Examining Elementary School Students’ Transfer of Learning through Engineering Design Using Think-Aloud Protocol Analysis. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 83-108.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164698.pdf

2.9Historical Analysis

2.9.1.Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2014). The historical research method and information systems research. Journal of the association for information systems, 15(9), 3.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301380648.pdf

2.9.2.Yang, Q., & Zhu, C. (2021). Socially Constructed Teacher Professionalism: An Historical Analysis of Teacher Education Reform Policies of Canadian Case. International Education Studies, 14(3), 1-14.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1288004.pdf

2.9.3.Veerasamy, S., & Yovana, P. (2020). US National Higher Education Internationalization Policy: An Historical Analysis of Policy Development between 2000 and 2019. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 12, 16-22.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1289741.pdf